Day 40 · Phase 3 — Ground Operations & ATC
Follow-me car confusion
올바른 차량/기 식별
영어 문장을 클릭하면 읽어줍니다. (브라우저 내장 음성 — 다시 누르면 멈춤)
팔로미 카는 편한 서비스지만, 함정이 하나 있습니다 — "me"가 누구인지 확실할 때만 작동한다는 것. 큰 공항 야간 램프엔 노란 경광등이 하나가 아니에요. 오늘은 잘못 따라가다 멈추고 재식별하는 이야기. 문법은 "원래 ~하기로 되어 있었다"의 be supposed to입니다.
1. Scenario
I was the First Officer of HL123, taxiing in at night at a large airport, assigned to remote stand 61.
Apron control told us a follow-me car would meet us at the end of taxiway Delta. As we rolled to the end of Delta, a yellow car ahead lit up its beacon, and we began to follow it — it looked exactly like what we were expecting.
Two turns later, something did not match. The car was heading toward the cargo apron, while stand 61 was supposed to be on the west side according to our chart. The moment it did not match, we stopped following and queried apron: "HL123 — confirm our follow-me? The car we are following is heading for the cargo ramp."
Apron sorted it out quickly. Two follow-me cars were working that area; the one we had picked was leading a freighter that had landed behind us, and the car we were supposed to follow was still waiting at Delta 2. Apron gave us the fix: "Your car is number 7 — it will flash its beacon twice and show your callsign on the board."
Car 7 pulled in ahead of us, its LED board reading "HL123", flashed twice, and led us to stand 61 without any further drama. We shut down on stand five minutes later than planned, and a lot wiser about yellow cars.
2. At a Glance
English — At night, assigned a follow-me to remote stand 61, we started following the first yellow beacon we saw — and two turns later it was heading for the cargo apron, not the west side where our stand was supposed to be. We stopped and queried. Two follow-me cars were working the area; ours was still waiting, and we had picked the freighter's. Apron re-identified positively — "car 7, it will flash twice and show your callsign" — and car 7 led us in. The lesson: follow-me only works when you are sure who "me" is. If the picture stops matching, stop following.
한국어 — 야간, 원격 스탠드 61 배정에 팔로미 안내. 우리는 처음 보인 노란 경광등을 따라갔고 — 두 번의 선회 뒤 그 차는 화물 램프 쪽으로 향했습니다. 차트상 스탠드 61은 서쪽이어야 했는데요. 그림이 안 맞는 순간 따라가기를 멈추고 질의했습니다. 그 구역엔 팔로미가 두 대 운용 중이었고, 우리 차는 아직 대기 중 — 우리가 따라간 건 뒤에 착륙한 화물기의 차였던 겁니다. 애프런이 확실한 재식별을 줬어요 — "당신 차는 7번, 비콘을 두 번 점멸하고 보드에 콜사인을 띄운다." 7번 차가 "HL123"을 표시하며 앞에 서서 스탠드 61까지 유도했습니다. 교훈 — 팔로미는 "me"가 누군지 확실할 때만 작동한다. 그림이 안 맞으면, 따라가지 마라.
3. Key Verbs
meet
뜻: (마중 나와) 만나다
- A follow-me car would meet us at the end of Delta.
- We were met by the wrong car, as it turned out.
pick
뜻: 고르다 (잘못 고르다)
- We picked the first yellow beacon we saw.
- The wrong car was picked in the dark.
lead
뜻: 이끌다, 유도하다
- That car was leading a freighter, not us.
- Car 7 led us to stand 61.
head
뜻: ~쪽으로 향하다
- The car was heading toward the cargo apron.
- We were heading the wrong way without knowing it.
doubt
뜻: 의심하다
- We began to doubt the car after the second turn.
- When you doubt the picture, stop following.
flash
뜻: (등을) 점멸하다
- "Your car will flash its beacon twice."
- The beacon flashed twice, exactly as briefed.
display
뜻: 표시하다
- The LED board displayed our callsign.
- "HL123" was displayed on the back of car 7.
mix up
뜻: 뒤섞다, 혼동하다
- The two cars got mixed up in the same area.
- We had mixed up our car with the freighter's.
pull in
뜻: (차량이) 끼어들어 서다
- Car 7 pulled in ahead of us.
- The correct car pulled in and took over.
guide
뜻: 유도하다
- We were guided to the stand without further drama.
- A follow-me car guides you — it does not clear you.
4. Key Expressions & Collocations
| Expression | 뜻 | 쓰임 |
|---|---|---|
| a follow-me car will meet you | 팔로미가 마중 나온다 | 배경 |
| the first yellow beacon we saw | 처음 보인 노란 경광등 | 함정 |
| two follow-me cars in the same area | 같은 구역의 팔로미 2대 | 원인 |
| the picture stopped matching | 그림이 맞지 않기 시작했다 | 의심 |
| stop following | 따라가기를 멈추다 | 핵심 조치 |
| confirm our follow-me | 우리 팔로미가 맞는지 확인 | 질의 |
| positive identification | 확실한 식별 | 해결 원리 |
| flash the beacon twice | 비콘 2회 점멸 | 식별 신호 |
| show the callsign on the board | 보드에 콜사인 표시 | 식별 신호 |
| lead us to the stand | 스탠드까지 유도하다 | 결과 |
5. Vocabulary
| Word | Meaning |
|---|---|
| follow-me car | 유도 차량 |
| beacon | 경광등 |
| LED board | (차량) 전광판 |
| remote stand | 원격 주기장 |
| cargo apron / ramp | 화물 계류장 |
| freighter | 화물기 |
| positive identification | 확실한 식별 |
| car number | 차량 번호 |
| night operations | 야간 운항 |
| guidance | 유도 |
6. Sentence Frames
빈칸만 갈아끼우면 다른 식별 혼동 시나리오에도 그대로 씁니다.
- ____ was supposed to ____, but instead it ____. → The car was supposed to head west, but instead it headed for the cargo apron.
- The moment it did not match, we ____. → The moment it did not match, we stopped following.
- Confirm ____ — the one we are following is ____. → Confirm our follow-me — the one we are following is heading for the cargo ramp.
- "Your ____ is number ____ — it will ____." → "Your car is number 7 — it will flash its beacon twice."
- We had mixed up ____ with ____. → We had mixed up our car with the freighter's.
오늘의 표현 포인트 — "The moment it did not match, we stopped following." 의심 → 즉시 정지. 팔로미든 클리어런스든, 그림이 안 맞는 순간이 멈출 순간입니다.
7. Common Mistakes → Better Phrasing
한국인이 자주 쓰는 틀리거나 약한 표현을, 시험에서 통하는 표현으로 바꿔 익히세요.
| ❌ 이렇게 말하기 쉬움 | ✅ 이렇게 |
|---|---|
| We followed some yellow car. | We picked the first yellow beacon we saw — that was the mistake. |
| The car went to wrong place. | The car was heading for the cargo apron, not our stand. |
| We feel strange about it. | The picture stopped matching, so we stopped following. |
| Is this our car? | "Confirm our follow-me — the one we are following is heading for the cargo ramp." |
| The real car came. | Car 7 pulled in ahead, showing our callsign on the board. |
| Follow-me means we can go. | A follow-me car guides you — it does not replace your clearance. |
8. Grammar Point — be supposed to (원래 ~하기로 되어 있다)
계획·기대와 실제가 어긋난 것을 말할 때 씁니다. "원래는 이랬어야 하는데"가 필요한 모든 서술에 등장해요.
- The car we were supposed to follow was still waiting at Delta 2.
- Stand 61 was supposed to be on the west side.
- The follow-me was supposed to meet us at the end of Delta.
핵심: be supposed to + 동사원형 = 예정·기대. 과거형 was/were supposed to는 "그랬어야 했는데 (실제는 달랐다)"는 어긋남까지 함께 전합니다.
9. Model Answer — Q1
"What happened to your aircraft? Explain the nature of the incident."
틀은 자유 — 무슨 일 → 어떻게 대처 → 결과 흐름이면 됩니다.
We were taxiing in at night at a large airport, assigned to remote stand 61, and apron control told us a follow-me car would meet us at the end of taxiway Delta. A yellow car ahead lit up its beacon right when we expected one, and we began to follow it.
Two turns later the picture stopped matching. The car was heading toward the cargo apron, while our stand was supposed to be on the west side. The moment it did not match, we stopped following and queried apron — "Confirm our follow-me? The car we are following is heading for the cargo ramp."
It turned out two follow-me cars were working that area. The one we had picked was leading a freighter that landed behind us, and the car we were supposed to follow was still waiting at Delta 2. Apron gave us positive identification this time: our car was number 7, it would flash its beacon twice, and it would show our callsign on its board.
Car 7 pulled in ahead of us reading "HL123", and led us to stand 61 without any further trouble. We parked five minutes late and nothing was bent — because follow-me only works if you are sure who "me" is.
10. Model Answer — Q2
"How do you think ATC handled the situation? Could it have been handled differently?"
Q2 = ATC 평가로 의견 표현을 익히는 자리. 아래는 한 예시 — 외워서 그대로 쓰지 말고, 시작·마무리 표현은 자유롭게 바꿔 보세요.
I'd split my answer in two. The recovery was genuinely good: the moment we queried, apron didn't waste a word on whose fault it was — they went straight to positive identification, giving us the car number, a flash signal, and the callsign on the board. That triple check turns "a yellow car" into "our yellow car", and it worked first time. Credit also to the calm tone; night ramps get messy fast when voices rise.
The setup, though, invited the mix-up. Two follow-me cars were working the same corner of the field, and our instruction was just "a car will meet you" — no number, no signal, nothing to tell one beacon from another. The fix costs one breath of radio time: give the car number in the first instruction, every time, whenever more than one car is out. Identification before movement, not after the wrong turn.
11. Follow-up Q&A
- How do you positively identify the right follow-me car? → By something only yours will do or show: the car number, a briefed flash signal, or your callsign on its board. "Yellow and flashing" describes every car out there.
- Why stop instead of following a bit further to see? → Every extra metre behind the wrong car takes you deeper into someone else's operation. Stopping is free; getting back out of a wrong ramp is not.
- Does a follow-me car replace your taxi clearance? → No. It guides you along a route; the clearance still comes from apron or ground. If the car leads where your clearance does not go, you stop.
- What made the mix-up easy at night? → Beacons all look identical in the dark, and expectation does the rest — we saw a yellow light exactly where we hoped for one, and our brain called it "ours".
12. Shadowing Sentences
각 문장을 3~5번 소리 내어 따라 하세요.
- A follow-me car was supposed to meet us at the end of Delta.
- We began to follow the first yellow beacon we saw.
- Two turns later, the picture stopped matching.
- The car was heading toward the cargo apron.
- The moment it did not match, we stopped following.
- Confirm our follow-me — the one ahead is heading for the cargo ramp.
- Two follow-me cars were working the same area.
- Your car is number 7 — it will flash its beacon twice.
- Car 7 pulled in ahead, showing our callsign on the board.
- Follow-me only works if you are sure who "me" is.
다 읽었으면, 위 문장 구조 몇 개를 골라 30초만 직접 말해보세요. 화면에서 녹음하고 ICAO 6영역 채점을 받아보고 싶다면 EPTA Coach에서 1회차를 무료로 열어둡니다.